The General Medical Council, our regulator, has recently appointed a brand-new chief executive officer. It comes with personal healthcare cover (on which the GMC invests nearly ₤ 223 000 a year, as well as over ₤ 25 000 on health checks for the 667 individuals it employs).
This is an intriguing consultation. The task description says that the effective candidate’s personal qualities must include the capability to “command the confidence and support of clients and the general public; medical professionals; the NHS …” along with the “intellectual capability to analyse complicated problems in a systemic and logical way.”
Massey is well known to junior physicians. He is director general for acute care and workforce at the Department of Health and was grilled by the Commons Public Accounts Committee in February about the costs of 7 day services and workforce preparation.3 The committee reported in Might that efforts to retain present staff were not well handled which “information used to monitor workforce numbers are not sufficiently trustworthy or comprehensive to support Health Education England’s choices.”
” No meaningful effort has actually been made to examine the headcount implications of a number of significant policy initiatives such as the seven day NHS,” stated the committee’s report.
The GMC is a monopoly organisation. If we are not registered with it we can not practise
Proof from Massey has been utilized versus the Justice for Health group of junior doctors. This group has taken the health secretary to the High Court, challenging whether his self declared “nuclear choice” 5 to enforce the brand-new junior medical professional contract is within his powers. Massey defends Jeremy Hunt vehemently.
The Department of Health, and after that the GMC press workplace, were asked what degree( s) the inbound CEO held. They informed me that a bio was offered online (it did not include this details) and that they would not add to it.
The GMC likewise sells lists of registered physicians to commercial entities: multiple drug business, private sector suppliers, and locum companies. It’s not possible for doctors to decide out of their information being shared in this method.
Is this really the sort of regulation that gives us self-confidence that it is an independent regulator– fair on medical professionals and protecting clients?
It comes with personal health care cover (on which the GMC spends nearly ₤ 223 000 a year, as well as over ₤ 25 000 on health checks for the 667 people it employs). Proof from Massey has been used against the Justice for Health group of junior doctors. This group has actually taken the health secretary to the High Court, challenging whether his self declared “nuclear choice” 5 to enforce the brand-new junior medical professional contract is within his powers. The GMC likewise sells lists of registered medical professionals to industrial entities: multiple drug companies, private sector providers, and locum agencies. It’s not possible for doctors to opt out of their info being shared in this method.
Adapted from a short article in the BMJ